Breaking the Binary Oppositions of the Interior: A Momentary Permanence
Main Article Content
|Issue||Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019)|
|Published||Jul 30, 2019|
Submitted : Apr 18, 2019 | Accepted : Jun 24, 2019
The previously static view of the interior is changing, as social, economic and cultural factors produce a new requirement for building flexibility and potentially forcing a change to the normal spatial paradigms. There is an emerging altered dynamic between building, interior and user, posing the question – when does architecture become the interior? Conceptions of the future interior give renewed focus to the more flexible void space, over the opposing static architectural shell. By adjusting the realms of contact within a space and limiting the influence of architecture, the user is re-envisioned as a central adjudicator of spatial experience. Provocatively, conceiving the interior as a more temporal or fluid entity, we may liberate its relationship with its immovable and constant architectural keeper. This paper will argue the dynamic city structure is driving a new conception of the interior and its place within society and architecture.
Caan, S. (2011). Rethinking design and interiors: Human beings in the built environment. London: Laurence King.
Can, I., & Heath, T. (2016). In-between spaces and social interaction: A morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9442-9
Coyne, R. (2012). Structuralism in architecture: Not a style but a tool for critique [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://richardcoyne.com/structuralism-in-architecture/
Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental psychology. New York: Random House.
Lehman, M. L. (2016). Adaptive sensory environments. London: Routledge.
Massey, D. (1995). Places and their pasts. History Workshop Journal, 39, 182-193.
McCarthy, C. (2005). Towards a definition of interiority. Space and Culture, 8(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331205275020
Price, C., & Littlewood, J. (1968). The Fun Palace. The Drama Review, 12(3),127-134.
Price, C., & Littlewood, J. (1964). 1964: Fun Palace [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.cca.qc.ca/fr/issues/2/cetait-le-futur/32737/1964-fun-palace
Ryder Architecture (n.d). Newcastle Central Station [Webpage]. Retrieved from https://www.ryderarchitecture.com/projects/newcastle-central-station.htm
Scott, F. (2008). On altering architecture. London: Routledge.
Söderqvist, L. (2011). Structuralism in architecture: A definition, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 3(1), 5414. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v3i0.5414
Stone, A. (2007). The underestimation of the interior. In J. Gigli & E. Hollis (Eds.), Thinking inside the box: A reader in interiors for the 21st century (pp. 227-238). London: Middlesex University Press.
Voordouw, J. (2018). Topology and interiority: Folding space inside. In G. Marinic (Ed.), The interior architecture theory reader (pp. 318-322). London: Routledge.
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.