Revisiting Bodies in Interior Design Practice
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
| Issue | Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) |
| Published | Jul 30, 2024 |
| Section | Editorial |
| Article downloads | 466 |
Abstract
Addressing human bodies is inevitable in interior inquiries and practices. Integrating knowledge about human bodies into design practice can extend beyond the idea of bodies as merely static entities with fixed dimensions. The idea of bodies as the basis for spatial design practice views the human body as a living entity that dwells, occupies, moves, and engages in space. Knowledge about bodies as the basis of practice also needs to view bodies' presence as sociocultural entities. The emergence of the virtual environment provides another context with a shifting materiality of bodies and interior spaces. This issue of Interiority acknowledges the breadth of knowledge about bodies in spatial design disciplines. The articles demonstrate various ideas that reflect some challenges surrounding the integration of knowledge about bodies into design practice.
Article Details
References
Daniel, R., & Chalmers, L. (2021). Thinking the body‐inside. Journal of Interior Design, 46(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12197
De Matteis, F. (2020). Affective spaces: Architecture and the living body. Routledge.
Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on virtual and real space. The MIT Press.
Jones, P. B., & Meagher, M. (Eds.). (2014). Architecture and movement: The dynamic experience of buildings and landscapes. Routledge.
Kira, A. (1967). The bath room: Criteria for design. Bantam Books.
Le Corbusier. (1954). The Modulor. Faber & Faber.
Leonard, Z. (2018). Measuring the human dimension: Domestic space, materiality, and making in Japan. In G. Marinic (Ed.), The interior architecture theory reader (pp. 280–288). Routledge.
Lorenzo-Palomera, J., Fuentes-Pérez, C., & Aranda-Jiménez, Y. (2022). Le Corbusier’s Modulor: Anthropometric myth. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 112–120.https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100110
Oderman, K. (2005). A house fitting. Southwest Review, 90(3), 412–427. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43472462
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Penner, B. (2018). Redesigning for the body: Users and bathrooms. In G. Brooker & L. Weinthal (Eds.), The handbook of interior architecture and design (pp. 261–277). Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
Smith, K. S., Smith, A. C., & Li, X. (2013). A human measure: Structure, meaning and operation of the ‘Lu Ban’ foot-rule (鲁班尺) of the Dong carpenters. Architectural Research Quarterly, 17(3–4), 227–236.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135514000050
Tell, D. (2019). Measurement and modernity: Height, gender, and Le Corbusier’s Modulor. Public Culture, 31(1), 21–43.https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-7181826
Voigt, K. (2021). Corporeality of architecture experience. Dimensions. Journal of Architectural Knowledge, 1(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.14361/dak-2021-0118
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.