Passage Territories: Reframing Living Spaces in Contested Contexts
Main Article Content
|Issue||Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018)|
|Published||Jul 30, 2018|
Submitted : Jul 12, 2018 | Accepted : Jul 23, 2018
This paper investigates the concept of ‘passage territories’ (Sennett, 2006), as living spaces constructed from one’s passage of movement from one separate space to another, and how it extends the discussion of interiority in contested contexts. Through observations of living spaces and the narrative accounts of dwellers’ in Kampung Pulo and Manggarai neighbourhoods of Jakarta, this study draws attention to the interiority of dispersed and layered spaces occupied by the kampungs’ dwellers. In this context, passage territories are driven by a) a limitation of space that, in turn, triggers the need to acquire more space; b) the occupation of a dweller that necessitates different types of space; and c) the limited access to infrastructural resources that influence the extent of a living space’s dispersal. Through the use of drawings, this study reveals the complete interiority of living spaces consisting of spaces with diverse spatial ownerships and scales. The boundaries of passage territories tend to be defned by the frequency and length of time needed for an activity instead of the relative proximity between certain spaces. Furthermore, the way objects are placed also shapes the boundaries of passage territories, both for permanent and temporary use of space. This paper then discusses the impact of this knowledge on the interiority of passage territories, proposing to use mechanisms of ‘patches’ and ‘corridors’ to shape the interior of territory that cross, share, and change into one another.
Alexander, C. (1965). A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum, 122(April), 58–62.
Atmodiwirjo, P., Yatmo, Y. A., & Ujung, V. (2015). Outside interior: Traversed boundaries in a Jakarta urban neighbourhood. IDEA Journal, 78-89.
Attiwill, S. (2011). Working space: Interiors as provisional compositions. In T. Meade (Ed.), Occupation: Negotiations with constructed space (pp. 1-8). Brighton: University of Brighton.
Dierwechter, Y. (2002). Six cities of the informal sector—and beyond. International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.24.1.2
Dovey, K., & Polakit, K. (2009). Urban slippage smooth and striated streetscapes in Bangkok. In K. Dovey (Ed.), Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. London; New York: Routledge.
Forty, A. (2004). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture (First Paperback Edition). New York: Thames and Hudson Ltd.
Gouverneur, D. (2015). Planning and design for future informal settlements. Retrieved from http://globalurbancommons.org/planning-and-design-for-future-informal-settlements/
Graham, S., & McFarlane, C. (2014). Introduction. In S. Graham (Ed.), Infrastructural lives: Urban infrastructure in context (pp. 1–14). Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.
Habraken, N. J. (2000). The structure of the ordinary: Form and control in the built environment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hollis, E. (2018). Unreliable Guides: Introducing, Mapping, and Performing Interior. Interiority, 1(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.6
Kärrholm, M. (2007). The materiality of territorial production. Space and Culture, 10(4), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207304356
Massey, D. (2005). For space. London; Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications.
Petrescu, D. (2012). Relationscapes: Mapping agencies of relational practice in architecture. City, Culture and Society, 3(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2012.06.011
Pimlott, M. (2018). Interiority and the conditions of interior. Interiority, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.5
Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Poot, T., Van Acker, M., & De Vos, E. (2015). The public interior: The meeting place for the urban and the interior. IDEA Journal, 2015, 44-55.
Sennett, R. (2006, November). Housing and urban neighbourhoods the open city. Urban Age.
Smith, C. L., & Ballantyne, A. (2010). Flow: Architecture, object and relation. Architectural Research Quarterly, 14(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135510000540
Smitheram, J., & Woodcock, M. (2009). Affective Territories. IDEA Journal, 2009, 8-19.
Soranart, S. (2011). Local flows: Rom Hoob’s phenomena of transition. In A. Ballantyne & C. Smith (Eds.), Architecture in the Space of Flows (pp. 135-143). Abingdon, Oxon, England; New York, NY: Routledge.
Yatmo, Y. A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). Spatial strategies for domestic service activities in urban kampung houses. International Journal of Technology, 4(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v4i1.98
Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Paramita, K. D. (2013). Whose waste is it anyway? Journal of Urban Design, 18(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.824364
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.