The Austerity Chic Interior, Gen Z, and Millennials' Domestic Dream

Main Article Content

Issue Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
Published Jul 30, 2022
Section Articles
Article downloads 195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.216
Submitted : Mar 14, 2022 | Accepted : Jul 1, 2022

Urtzi Grau Magana Guillermo Fernández-Abascal

Abstract

This paper reviews domestic spaces completed in the last ten years to address the following research questions: How do Australian Gen Z and millennials in Sydney, who are currently shaping their future life, imagine their home? What are the domestic values and hopes of two generations that had their coming of age in the Information Era, and who naturally embrace digital technology and social media? What do size, scale, material, and technical innovation mean for a climate-conscious group of people that have lived through COVID-19 confinement, an endless real estate bubble, and recurrent economic crises? Grouped in five categories—sharing life, managing climate, naturalised interiors, reusing new materials, and austerity chic—the analysis of the study cases outlines these generations' emerging architectural interests. The five categories also inform a proposal for an interior constructed with fragments of the study cases that illustrates the paper’s conclusions and imagines a possible domestic space for Gen Z and millennials. 

Keywords: shared domestic life, interior climate, naturalised interiors, domestic materials, austerity chic

Article Details

How to Cite
Magana, U. G., & Fernández-Abascal, G. (2022). The Austerity Chic Interior, Gen Z, and Millennials’ Domestic Dream. Interiority, 5(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.216
Author Biographies

Urtzi Grau Magana, University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Urtzi Grau Magana is an architect, academic, senior lecturer in the School of Architecture at University of Technology Sydney, and founding partner of the office GFA and Fake Industries. His research explores the role of architecture in responding to critical challenges impacting the Indo-Pacific region, including climate justice, immigration, land rights, and extractive economics

Guillermo Fernández-Abascal, University of Sydney, Australia

Guillermo Fernández-Abascal is an architect, a practice fellow at the University of Sydney, and founding partner of the offices GFA2 and GFA. Based in Sydney, Australia, and Santander, Spain, his recent work destabilises the dichotomy of research vs buildings and includes diagrams, stories, exhibitions, films, prototypes, housing, and public buildings across the globe. His recent projects include the books Learning to Live Together: Cars, Humans, and Kerbs in Solidarity, and Regional Bureaucracy, the exhibition Better Together: Stories of Contemporary Documents, the research project The Future of Living, the building for the Enaire Foundation in Santander, and the masterplan for the Machine Khana in Kabul, Afghanistan.

References

Andrés Jaque / Office of Political Innovation. (2009). Rolling house for the rolling society [Design prototype]. Barcelona, Spain.

Andrés Jaque / Office of Political Innovation. (2015). Sheltering the rolling society: A post-typological urbanism of non-familiar shared homes. Volume, 60(4), 86–91.

architecten de vylder vinck taillieu. (2013). rot-ellen-berg [Building]. Braives, Belgium.

Aureli, P. V. (2013). Less is enough: On architecture and asceticism. Strelka Press.

Austerity chic. (2009, April 28). The Economist. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.economist.com/business/2009/04/28/austerity-chic

Australian-first hardwood CLT plant to be built in regional Tasmania. (n.d.). timber MEDIA LIMITED. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from https://www.timbermedia.co.uk/australian-first-hardwood-clt-plant-to-be-built-in-regional-tasmania/ 

Balch, O. (2016, October 13). The commons: Could co-housing offer a different kind of great Australian dream? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/oct/31/the-commons-could-co-housing-offer-a-different-kind-of-great-australian-dream

Baracco + Wright. (2014). Garden house [Building]. Westernport, Victoria, Australia.

Baracco, M., & Wright, L. (2017). Robin Boyd: Spatial continuity. Routledge.

BAST. (2019). T02 [Building]. Toulouse, France.

BAST. (2020). M26 [Building]. Toulouse, France. 

BAST, & Littoral. (2020). M27 [Building]. Mimizan, France.

Besler & Sons. (2018). Props [Product]. Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Bourriaud, N. (2006). Postproduction. Culture as screenplay: How art reprograms the world. Sternberg Press.

Boyd, R. (1969). Featherston House [Building]. Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia. 

Brandlhuber+Emde, Burlon. (2014). The antivilla [Building]. Potsdam, Germany.

Breathe Architecture. (2013). The commons [Building]. Brunswick, Victoria, Australia.

Buckley, C. (2019) Graphic assembly: Montage, media, and experimental architecture in the 1960s. University of Minnesota Press.

BUREAU A. (2014). Antoine [Building]. Verbier, Switzerland.

Carlos Arroyo Architects. (2012). OostCampus [Building]. Oostkamp, The Netherlands.

Coldwell, W. (2019, September 3). 'Co-living': The end of urban loneliness – or cynical corporate dormitories? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/sep/03/co-living-the-end-of-urban-loneliness-or-cynical-corporate-dormitories

Druot, F., Lacaton, A., & Vassal, J.-P. (2007). From plus: Large-scale housing development. Gustavo Gili.

Dyvik Kahlen Architects. (2018). Twin arch [Building]. London, United Kingdom.

Flammer, P. (2013). House in Balsthal [Building]. Balsthal, Switzerland.

Frey, A. (1964). Frey House II [Building]. Palm Springs, California, United States of America.

Geer, J., (2015, August 24). The Commons raises the bar for environmental and social sustainability. Assemble Papers. https://assemblepapers.com.au/2015/08/24/the-commons-raise-the-roof/ 

Geers, K., Pančevac, J., & Zanderigo, A. (Eds.). (2016). The difficult whole: A reference book on Robert Venturi, John Rauch and Denise Scott Brown. Park Books.

Goodhouse, A. (Ed.). (2017). When is the digital in architecture? Sternberg Press. 

Grima, J., (2012). Adhocracy [Exhibition]. Istanbul, Turkey. 

Husos. (2012). Edificio jardín hospedero y nectarífero [Building]. Cali, Colombia.

Husos. (2017). Urbanismos de remesas [Classic Latin American transverse photo story magazine].

Husos. (2019). Guy, his bulldog, a vegetable garden, and the home they share [Building]. Madrid, Spain. 

Husos. (2020). (Synanthro)love shack, (tele)working abode [Building]. Madrid, Spain.

ifau and Jesko Fezer, & Heide & von Beckerath. (2013). R50 – cohousing [Building]. Berlin, Germany.

Ishigami, J. (2008). Small images. INAX-Shuppan. 

Ishigami, J., Igarashi, T., & Birnbaum, A. (2008). Plants and Architecture. junya.ishigami+associates.

junya.ishigami+associates. (2013). House for a young couple [Building]. Tokyo, Japan.

Jasper, A. (2019, December). Proportional representation. e-flux Architecture: Positions. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/positions/306654/proportional-representation/ 

Jencks, C., & Silver, N. (1973). AD HOCISM: The case for improvisation. Anchor Books Doubleday.

Küng, M. (Ed.). (2020). Sam Chermayeff [et al.]: Creatures. Apartamento.

Lacaton & Vassal. (2016). 96 lodgments in Chalon-sur-Saône [Building]. Chalon-sur-Saône, France.

Lacaton & Vassal. (2020). Qualities of inhabiting. ETH Zurich D-ARCH.

LACOL Arquitectura Cooperativa. (2018a). Building collectively, participation in architecture and urban planning. Pol·len edicions.

LACOL Arquitectura Cooperativa. (2018b). Cooperativa d'habitatgelLa borda [Building]. Barcelona, Spain.

Lapierre, E. (2019). The poetic of reason: Lisbon architecture triennale [Exhibition]. Lisbon, Portugal. https://2019.trienaldelisboa.com/en/

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Harvard University Press.

Lynn, G. (Curator). (2013a). Archaeology of the digital [Exhibition]. Montreal, Canada. https://www.cca.qc.ca/en/events/3333/archaeology-of-the-digital

Lynn, G. (Ed.). (2013b). Archaeology of the digital. Sternberg Press.

Lynn, G. (Curator). (2014). Archaeology of the digital: Media and machines [Exhibition]. Montreal, Canada. https://www.cca.qc.ca/en/events/3425/archaeology-of-the-digital-media-and-machines

Lynn, G. (Curator). (2016). Archaeology of the digital: Complexity and convention [Exhibition]. Montreal, Canada. https://www.cca.qc.ca/en/events/38273/archaeology-of-the-digital-complexity-and-convention

MAPA architects. (2018). MINIMOD [Building]. Curucaca, Santa Catarina, Brasil. 

Marklee, J. (Artistic director). (2017). Make new history: 2nd Chicago architecture biennial [Exhibition]. Chicago Cultural Center, Chicago, United States of America. https://chicagoarchitecturebiennial.org/edition/2017

Märkli, P. (2012). Im Gut [Building]. Zurich, Switzerland.

Marres, N. (2015). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. Springer.

Menkes, S. (2009, January 26). So much for austerity chic. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/26/style/26iht-rdior.4.19687864.html. 

Nasreen, Z., & Ruming, K. (2019). Room sharing in Sydney: A complex mix of affordability, overcrowding and profit maximisation. Urban Policy and Research, 37(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2018.1556632

Neustein, D. (2020, March 1). Plans never imagined: Architect Timothy Hill. The Monthly. https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2020/march/1582981200/david-neustein/plans-never-imagined-architect-timothy-hill#mtr 

Partners Hill. (2019). Daylesford longhouse [Building]. Daylesford, Australia. 

Power, A. (2018) House with a guest room [Building]. Red Head, New South Wales, Australia.

Quan, T. (2009, March 2). Austerity chic. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/feb/24/new-york-economy-real-estate 

Ruby, I., & Ruby, A. (2013). Druot, Lacaton & Vasal: Tour bois le prêtre. Ruby Press.

Studio PER. (1975). Vittoria Tracino house [Building]. Cala Tramontana, Pantelleria Island, Sicily, Italy.

Taillieu, V. V. (2013). Sustainable construction due to reduction of processes: House Rot-Ellen-Berg. Oudenaarde (Belgium), 2011. Arquitectura y Tecnología, 41, 14–17.

Toyo Ito & Associates. (1984). Silver hut [Building]. Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 

Toyo Ito & Associates. (1985). Pao I: Dwelling for a Tokyo nomad woman [Building]. Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. 

Toyo Ito & Associates. (1989). Pao II: Dwelling for a Tokyo nomad woman [Building]. Brussels, Belgium.

Tyson, A., Kennedy, B., & Funk. (2021, May 6). Gen z, millennials stand out for climate change activism, social media engagement with issue. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/05/26/gen-z-millennials-stand-out-for-climate-change-activism-social-media-engagement-with-issue/

van Eyck, A. (1947). Aldo van Eyck apartment [Building]. Binnenkant, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 

van Severen, M. (1997). B22 [Product]. Gent, Belgium.

Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. Museum of Modern Art.

Williams, G. (2016, March 2). A former German underwear factory, now an elegant concrete villa. The New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/t-magazine/arno-brandlhuber-brutalist-architecture-home.html 

Zaera-Polo, A. (2016). Well into the 21st century: The architectures of postcapitalism? El Croquis, 187, 252–286.