Main Article Content
|Issue||Vol 4 No 2 (2021)|
|Published||Jul 31, 2021|
Submitted : Mar 31, 2021 | Accepted : Jul 13, 2021
Design is approaching a crucial period where the exchange between interior and exterior systems needs to be rethought and addressed from the standpoint of resilience and innovative environmental responses. The era of the detached interior bubble that is climate controlled and therein severed from natural systems is no longer justified or feasible. Interior spaces must respond to environmental conditions and proactively engage natural systems. The paper examines grafting methodology as an interior spatial formula that aims to generate complex sectional strategies for new programmatic typologies. It showcases work from a third-year interior architecture studio where students utilised natural landscapes as the premise to develop generative computational models that informed their design interventions.
While placing interior interventions between natural and synthetic processes, interior grafts outline a design tactic that challenges the disjunction between internal settings and external parameters. The potential to draw relevance from external parameters and integrate the derivative systems into the interior volume carries many implications for interior architecture and urban dynamics. This approach demarks a radical repositioning of the interior volume as a continuation of the exterior scape, proliferating a fluid and active interiority.
Alexa, A. (2016, March 1). Claude Parent’s vision for a tilted world. Core77. https://www.core77.com/posts/47856/Claude-Parents-Vision-for-a-Tilted-World
Ansari, I. (n. d.). Animal machines: The architecture of the body. Places. https://placesjournal.org/reading-list/animal-machines-the-architecture-of-the-body/
Barker, H. R. (2016). Adaptive environmental interfaces: Biomimetic morphologies and tactical urbanism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.085
Beesley, P. (2016). Can architecture embody living systems? Emerging ‘living’ technologies and synthetic biology. Architectural Research Quarterly, 20(2), 92–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135516000439
Bertalanffy, L. (1973). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Brownell, B. E., & Swackhamer, M. (2015). Hypernatural: Architecture’s new relationship with nature. Princeton Architectural Press.
Burroughs, M. (2018, September 10). How Verner Panton changed the way the world sees furniture design. AnOther. https://www.anothermag.com/design-living/11113/how-verner-panton-changed-the-way-the-world-sees-furniture-design
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Graft. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/graft
Johnston, P. (1996). The function of the oblique: The architecture of Claude Parent and Paul Virilio, 1963–1969. AA Publications.
Kretzer, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Kretzer & L. Hovestadt (Eds.), Alive: Advancements in adaptive architecture (pp. 16–23). Birkhäuser.
Grau, D., & Zahm, O. (2013). Claude Parent: Architecture for the future. Purple, 20. https://purple.fr/magazine/fw-2013-issue-20/claude-parent/
Pasquero, C., & Poletto, M. (2014). Ecology beyond nature. In M. Kretzer & L. Hovestadt (Eds.), Alive: Advancements in adaptive architecture (pp. 34–38). Birkhäuser.
Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence. John Wiley & Sons.
Schwab, K. (2016, January 14) The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond. Weforum. www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
Torrents i Alegre, J., Bescos, G., & Ribas i Boldu, J. (2014). Grafting architecture: Catalonia at Venice. Institut Ramon Llull. https://www.llull.cat/monografics/venezia2014/english/index.cfm
Copyright (c) 2021 Rana Abudayyeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.