Main Article Content
|Issue||Vol 4 No 1 (2021)|
|Published||Jan 29, 2021|
Submitted : Sep 24, 2020 | Accepted : Dec 28, 2020
This contribution reviews the recent renovation of Z33—House for Contemporary Art, Design and Architecture in Hasselt, Belgium—in the light of its unique implementation of different levels of interiority. The institute is housed in the former beguinage, a site with a rich and layered history and one of the few green public spaces in the city centre. The intervention by architect Francesca Torzo builds further on and strengthens the existing qualities of the site through a creative process of copying and improving. By doing so, she changed the overall appearance of the beguinage, strengthening its quality as an enclosed public space—an intimate yet collective hortus conclusus.
Aben, R., & De Wit, S. (1999). The enclosed garden: History and development of the hortus conclusus and its reintroduction into the present-day urban landscape. 010 Publishers.
Gurian, E. H. (2005). Threshold fear. In S. MacLeod (Ed.), Reshaping museum space: Architecture, design, exhibitions (pp. 203– 214). Routledge.
Heynickx, S., Plevoets, B., Van Cleempoel, K., & Vanrie, J. (2014, September 18-19). Vivisection in architecture: A comprehensive reading of the room by drawing. Body + Space Conference 2014, Middlesex University London, UK
Hill, J. (2003). Actions of architecture: Architects and creative users. Routledge.
Klasto, C. (2019). Tokyo’s Kyōshō Jūtaku: Nature through the inside, outside and the in-between. Interiority, 2(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.63
Leahy, H. R. (2005). Producing a public for art: Gallery space in the twenty‐first century. In S. MacLeod (Ed.), Creative space (pp. 108-117). Routledge.
MacLeod, S. (2013). Museum architecture: A new biography. Taylor & Francis Group.
Marotta, A. (2012). Typology: Museums. The Architectural Review. Retrieved from https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/typology/typology-museums
Pimlott, M. (2016). The public interior as idea and project. Jap Sam Books.
Pimlott, M. (2018). Interiority and the conditions of interior. Interiority, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.5
Sanjek, R. (Ed.) (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Cornell University Press.
Sennett, R. (2018). Building and dwelling: Ethics for the city. Allen Lane.
Simmel, G. (2012). The metropolis and mental life. In J. Lin & C. Mele (Eds.), The urban sociology reader (pp. 37-45). Routledge.
Teston, L. (2020). On the nature of public interiority. Interiority, 3(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v3i1.72
Van Cleempoel, K. (forthcoming). Memory as a design studio: The transformation of the Hasselt Beguinage into a Faculty of Architecture. TRACE–Notes on Adaptive Reuse, 3.
Vande Keere, N., & Plevoets, B. (2018). The interiority of the landscape. The hortus conclusus as a leitmotiv for adaptive reuse. TRACE Notes on Adaptive Reuse, 1, 23–32. https://www.uhasselt.be/images/faculteiten/architectuur_kunst/ TRACE_N%C2%B01_UHARK_digitalCORR.pdf
Wolfrum, S. (2018). Porous city: From metaphor to urban agenda. Birkhäuser.
Copyright (c) 2021 Bie Plevoets, Shailja Patel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.