Urban Interiority and the Spatial Processes of Securitisation in Medellin A Speculation on the Architectures of Reassurance

Main Article Content

Published Feb 27, 2018
Issue Vol 1 No 1 (2018)
Section Articles
Article downloads 162

Christina Deluchi

Abstract

Medellín, Colombia, a city best known for its violent history and subsequent radical transformation, hosts multiple political forces of varying degrees of legitimacy. In this context, architecture was mobilised as a physical weapon in the city’s urban regions. As an extension of this architectural condition, the city’s landscape has repeatedly been appropriated and repurposed to enforce state and criminal agency. Medellín’s cultural geography became increasingly unstable as both real and imagined threats lingered in the spaces of every day – apartment towers, gated communities, supermarkets, TV and radio, imbued with violent operational spatial logics.

In detecting processes of regulation, protection, and surveillance, the political instrumentality and larger urban implications of interior space in Medellín are revealed through architectural objects and spatial devices of control. As techniques of securitisation, these processes provide evidence for the construction of Medellín’s interiority, an urban condition founded on political violence and withdrawal. The objects and devices of this interiority are often remarkably ordinary, yet they are the political tools that indoctrinate a military-style urbanism that interprets, registers, and shapes territorial conflict. The mobilisation of Medellín’s interiority in the pursuit of power and control has manufactured an urban imaginary governed by the constant threat of violence.

Keywords: interiority, politics, urban imaginary, Medellín, Colombia

Article Details

How to Cite
Deluchi, C. (2018). Urban Interiority and the Spatial Processes of Securitisation in Medellin. Interiority, 1(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.7

References

Abello-Colak, A. & Guarneros-Meza, V. (2014). The role of criminal actors in local governance. Urban Studies, 51(15).

Cohen, J.-L. (2011). Architecture in uniform: Designing and building for the Second World War. Paris: Editions Hazan.

Easterling, K. (2005). Enduring innocence: Global architecture and its political masquerades. London: MIT Press.

Graham, S. (2010). Cities under seige: The new military urbanism. London: Verso.

Hylton, F. (2007). “Extreme Makeover”: Medellín in the new millenium. In D. B. M. Mike Davis (Ed.), Evil paradises: Dreamworlds of neoliberalism (pp. 152-163). New York: The New Press.

Katz, C. (2007). Banal terrorism: Spatial fetishism and everyday insecurity. In A. P. Derek Gregory (Ed.), violent geographies: fear, terror, and political violence. New York: Routledge.

Lambert, L. (2016). Imaginaries of violence. ARQ, 94, 26-35.

McGuirk, J. (2014). Radical cities: across latin america in search of a new architecture. London: Verso.

Mollison, J. (2007). The memory of Pablo Escobar. London: Chris Boot Ltd.

Moncada, E. (2016). Urban violence, political economy, and territorial control: Insights from Medellín. Latin American Research Review, 51(4), 225-248.

Salazar, A. (1990). Born to die in Medellín. London: Latin America Bureau (Research and Action) Ltd.

Stienen, A. (2009). Urban technology, conflict education, and disputed space. Journal of Urban Technology, 16(2-3), 109-142.

Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. London: Verso.

Weizman, E. (2014). Introduction: Forensis. In F. Architecture (Ed.), Forensis: The architecture of public truth (pp. 9-32). New York: Sternberg Press.